- Submit your mock-up and introductory text on the Major Project forum for peer feedback.
- Write a reflective commentary that summarises the cohort’s response and your implementation of the feedback. Also include a self-reflection of how you will undertake your final adjustments.
Once complete, share a link to your learning log via the Photography 3.3: Major Project Forum and the Feedback Point 8 thread, available via the Photography Department. Whilst there, feel free to access and provide feedback on fellow students’ posts.
Upon completion of this activity, you may continue onto the next project and this assignment will be retrospectively marked as complete shortly afterwards.
I note that I didn’t have access to all of the units forums and had to ash the Tech Team to make some changes to my permissions. My post showing a PDF document of my Iamge Sequence along with peer feedback appears on the PH6MPT Unit Forum . For completeness, I also posted the PDF document onto the Feedback Point 8 although this post has no feedback because I suspect that like me, nobody on the unit has access to this forum.
My mock-up of my major project works in parallel with the continuation of my creation and editing process alongside thinking hard about the titles of my works and how the titles sit within my project as a tool to direct the flow of my work and to explain things which aren’t immediately obvious in my visual work.
Write a reflective commentary that summarises the cohort’s response and your implementation of the feedback. Also include a self-reflection of how you will undertake your final adjustments.
I presented a mockup with my images to date in order an introduction, with titles for my work and text explaining the work. I ended with a section I called what else. I show the text elements of this document below:
Mock up
My post to the 3.3 forum is at the following link:
https://learn.oca.ac.uk/mod/hsuforum/discuss.php?d=6875
For completeness I also show the PDF document that I shared with my peer group for this month’s project.
I show below the text which accompanies my images bot the image titles and additional text
- Initial work to introduce my project, “Hospital time runs very slowly”
This image is obviously of a hospital corridor. I took this photograph in the long evenings when I walked these corridors when my children being treated.
- “My view from my daughter’s hospital room”
It is interesting how perspective changes if I provide this information.
- “My daughter’s view”
The previous image showed the view from the hospital window. It was my view. Rebecca was often bed-bound because of the pain so her perspective of her hospital room was a very different sense from mine. It is interesting how perspective changes.
- “I have Never Taken the Lid Off Rebecca’s Memory Box”
A shot of the memory box Rebecca filled with objects precious to her when she knew she was dying.
- “The Precipice”
This work shows the mixture of discomfort expressed through fear of heights yet at the same time shows a happy child with arms spread unafraid of the drop.
- “The Precipice”
This work shows the mixture of discomfort expressed through fear of heights yet at the same time shows a happy child with arms spread unafraid of the drop.
- “Scatter”
My video shows ash falling. This work re-creates the spreading of Rebecca’s ashes. The stones are river pebbles collected from the same location. I continue to refine and test variations of this work. As I want to shoot it outdoors, my work is subject to things outwith my control such as rain and especially the wind. I like this element that is outside my control but it makes the work difficult to make. I have been looking to change the backdrop and remove the pebbles so that we just see the ash falling. I have also experimented with different materials other than ash to change how the ‘ash’ appears to fall. I have to be careful as I make these changes. I question whether my aim is something more aesthetically ‘pleasing’ or whether my work should retain a sense of ‘strangeness’?
- “The abruptness of death”
The photograph has been corrupted to simulate the passage of time both deliberately and accidentally. contrast and accidentally. The red section was a glitch and expresses the idea that death for many of us is sudden and out of our control.
- “Looking Back at Life”
- “The Significance of Death”
We might imagine ourselves to be individuals but death is a universal constant. Each person looks towards the liminal threshold as if they have a single mind.
- “Letting Go”
My see-saw is a simple installation but is one which has been a total pain in the neck trying to get this over the line. I have a metal balance on hold from East Lothian Council but it looks nothing like a traditional see-saw. I have approached another supplier who is going to post me a hinge although our conversation is taking forever. My current plan is to build my own see-saw. I have the wood to do this and just need to construct some kind of balance. I have experimented with decoration, looking at cyanotypes on wood and at laminated of some slab gravestones to place on the wood. These tests for me seemed to muddle the concept of the see-saw representing children and balance so I plan to leave this as bare wood with the metal bracing which was part of plank when used as scaffold board. Am interested in how this object will look in a gallery setting. I thought of Tracy Emin’s bed when shifted from the bedroom to a sterile white gallery space. Similarly, Marcel Duchamp’s famous Fountain, moved from realm of
Introduction
“My art has grown from a place of sorrow and the trauma of grief following the death of my daughter. I struggle with this theme of loss, creating visual works based around the media of photography which allow me to externalise my feelings and to speak not just of my own personal experiences but also look to the wider universal constant. The richness of my memory of my daughter, my engagement with her death and my gradual acceptance and understanding of grief means that my work is emotionally charged but with a palette which has relevance for the wider society. I begin with the straightforward depiction of place and time before shifting to more conceptual works which attempt to describe loss and ask questions about mortality. “
functional porcelain into the art gallery with the simplest date and signature on the side.
What else?
I am at the stage now where if I were a painter, I might wonder if I go any further, might I overwork my idea? Is less more? I have other ideas, but I wonder whether my project needs anything else to tell its story. My tutor suggested the possibility of a companion project separate from this main one. I have been thinking about this and whether this might complement my main project and whether this could act as a counterbalance to tell a slightly different story. I have contacted my chosen gallery to find a suitable date and will be interested if there is any space for me to bring some of my works to the space to test them in situ and for me to get a sense of scale. This exercise might determine what I do with this second project. I would also like to try a selection of different ways to show my work, whether using some form of basic frame and mount or a basic surface mount, whether just taping my work to the wall or using a hidden method of attaching the works to the wall. I am drawn to artwork mounted on wood which is trimmed to the same size as the print. I have wondered about using wood or different colours of Perspex or other materials.
I have also investigated samples from The Newspaper Club in Glasgow and think that a simple 55gsm broadsheet or tabloid publication to accompany my exhibition would sit well. I saw another artist who had printed up business cards and had a selection of prints for sale in a rack as well as a price list for the works on the wall. I would have to think about each of these elements to see if I wanted to go down this route.
Peer Feedback
The first comment was from Caroline Black. She though that my initial 4 pictures of the corridor, view from the hospital window, Rebecca’s bedside and the memory box sent the viewer on a journey without knowing what the specific outcome might be. Some of the story could be inferred by hospital location. Some seemed to tell a story visually and some needed the prick of the title. Image 4 of the memory box was thought to be especially poignant with comment about the heartache, “the inclusion of the titles gives a very clear understanding to the viewer. It places this work as a heartbreaking personal experience.” (Black, 2024). There was a comment made on my use of black and white for the memory box image, which was thought to separate it from the first 3 images: the first 3 in colour when Rebecca was alive and image 4 after she was dead. I hadn’t considered this point of life and death, before and after, in these pieces, so that was an interesting revelation for me. My work then shifts gear to become more conceptual. Caroline considered that my ‘straight’ images lay the foundation for my later works. The titles for these conceptual works were of more importance to guide the viewer through the sequence.
The next review from Barry touched on the introductory text. He thought that my text was “honest, personal and somehow engaging.” (Rourke, 2024) There was very interesting thought on my titles, which were said to widen my work to let others in. I worry about how much I said in my supplementary text and if this has guided my audience too much. In my final exhibition I wouldn’t have any supplementary text other than project introduction and titles for my works. There was a very strong, almost visceral response to my question on whether I introduce some of my album images and objects related to loss as a supplemental exhibition next to my main work. “PLEASE do not then dilute my engagement by offering other, different pictures. If they add to your narrative fine, but this an exhibition, not a retrospective.” (Rourke, 2024) This a very important point. My narrative and the story I tell is key and is the function of this work. Anything which detracts from that clarity must be rejected.
We are a small group on 3.3 and the third and final piece of feedback was from Giorgio Colonna. Giorgio thought my titles were very powerful and offered an entry point to my work, “emotional entry point and contextualize the images in a way that deepens their meaning. The titles enhance your visual narrative, making it more personal and specific. I think your titles elevate the emotional depth of your project, helping to anchor each piece within the larger context of loss, memory, and mortality.” (Colonna, 2024) Again I worried I had said too much and given too much away with my text. Giorgio agreed with Barry on the dangers of overworking or diluting the emotional impact which at the same time thought there might be an interesting counterpoint here.
Reflective Summary
This was nice feedback from a privileged group who are familiar with my work as it has developed and with my back story. After I received the feedback and reviewed the comments made, I had regrets about providing additional text to explain my work and choices. However, in saying this, my peer group are not strangers to my work and so already have a vantage point over my work which the general public would not have. I think I have tried to make my work ‘easier’ in terms of understanding what I am communication but also with respect top the emotional impact. This is the first adjustment I will make. Trying to refine any text, including my titles, which accompany my creative works. I agree with the strength of the comment about not compromising my work and my narrative by adding too much. As with the text, less is more. I was pleased with the comments on the change in pace between straight works and my conceptual pieces. This was confirmation that my concept was viable. I was surprised that there was no comment on the content of my selection, whether my peers thought there were gaps or if any works said too much or repeated a message and so were surplus to requirements. This is something I am actively considering.
My peers are a privilidged group and quite different from the wider public who have no background experience of my project nor do they know anything about me. I worried about the public for a long time and how they might respond to my work. It is important to consider that whatever I want the public to know before they see my work, I will have to tell them. The rest is information they can work out for themselves from my work and the titles I give to each work.